Writer: Muwafaq Mahadin

In addition to the current political dimensions of the Jewishness of the “state,” and the enemy’s attempt to seize Jerusalem and Judaize it as a political center, there is a racist ideological dimension that is no less important, which is the idea of the chosen people versus the goyim.

This approach is based on contrast and disagreement with the common and prevailing impressions and perceptions that go to distinguish between Zionism and Judaism in circulation, based on its focus on Zionism as the greatest evil, as opposed to Judaism, which is being marketed (wrongly) alongside the heavenly religions. If Zionism is a political movement created by colonial circles to establish an aggressive, occupational settlement entity, in order to protect its interests in the eastern Mediterranean, and separate the Arab East from its West, according to the decisions of Campbell-Bannerman, then Judaism is a racist ideological phenomenon, whose declared title is: “God’s Chosen People.”

It is noteworthy here that this characterization was also widespread among dozens of international writers and thinkers, such as Shakespeare, Marlowe, Turgenev, and Dostoevsky (English literature and Russian literature, in particular) and among thinkers, such as Marx, Engels, and Le Bon. Marx even linked liberation from capitalism with liberation from Judaism. 

The “chosen people” here are not just one of many peoples, but rather they are the only people who deserve to live on earth and succeed the Lord in it. As for all other peoples and humans, they are herds of goyim equal to animals. It is permissible to kill them, take their money, and take their girls captive. God created them (in Jewish ideology) to serve His “chosen” people, whether they were tribes or developed or backward sects. Therefore, when the Torah repeats the well-known commandments, what is meant by them is: Do not kill or rob a Jew. Thus, according to the second founder of Judaism, Moses ben Maimon (Saladin al-Ayyubi’s physician, educator of his children, and advisor), the prophets do not descend upon a people other than “the lineage of David,” and from that he proceeded to attack both Christ and the Messenger of Islam.

Where circles in Christianity submitted to Jewish blackmail, claiming that “Christ is the son of David” in order to overcome Jewish denial, the (Israeli) penetrations into Islam took another direction, which is the direction of identification with Judaism, especially through the phenomenon of Wahhabism and the majority of British and then American political Islam groups.

In addition, and in refuting Biblical racism, the overwhelming majority of the world’s Jews are not a “chosen people,” even in the Biblical sense, as the majority of Eastern Jews (Sephardic) descend from the Yemeni Himyar Empire, in addition to other Arab regions. The majority of Western Jews (Ashkenazim) descend from the Turkish Khazar Empire, and there is a common economic-social denominator between them resulting from the Elaphic environment, which combines trade and conquest. The Himyarite state and the Khazar state arose around trade routes and flourished under certain circumstances. As the importance of these roads declined, empires fell, in addition to being exhausted in the wars of tribes and competing empires. The Himyarite Jews were dispersed throughout the Arabian Peninsula and its outskirts, and the Turkic Khazar Jews were dispersed in Eastern and Western Europe, before the British Intelligence unit brought them together in the well-known Zionist project.

Suspicious settlements:
Although Judaism does not recognize the coming of Christ, and believes that the crucified Christ is the “Antichrist,” and does not recognize the message of Muhammad and his prophecy, and its second founder (Musa ibn Maimon, advisor to Saladin al-Ayyubi) doubts this prophecy, it quickly gathered to establish relations with Judaism. A document in the major Christian forums, as in establishing a secret alliance before going public with the new oil and liquefied gas and Ottoman protectorates:

  1. After decades of long bloody conflict with Christianity (the Byzantine Empire) and the Crusades that exterminated all the Jews in their path, and this was completed by the European Church Inquisition, the relationship took a different turn, accompanying the Lutheran Revolution and the decline of the German Empire and the authority of the Vatican, and with the emergence of monarchical states over the years. The ruins of this empire, the states known as the states of Westphalia (the 1648 agreement that consecrated them), became the Vatican and the national monarchy states together became in need of Jewish loans and money, which had accumulated in the hands of the rabbis when Christian Europe forbade usury.

This money flowed (in light of the Lutheran Reformation) with the fatwas of the popes as well, and the narrative (Matthew) turned into a papal reference (Christ is from the lineage of David), and reading the Old Testament (the Torah) became necessary and accompanied the reading of the New Testament. The new school (Jewish Christianity) began to penetrate broad ecclesiastical currents, which integrated into the colonial policies of the East, under the strange title of the new Crusades, and in a manner completely opposite to the old campaigns, which took hostility to the Jews as their main title, while the alliance with the Jews in colonial times became the norm. The title of these times. Indeed, some of the Masonic lodges, which had refused the entry of Jews into them, fell under their control since the nineteenth century, and Freemasonry became synonymous with Judaism and Zionism in its slogans, rituals, and secret and public fraternities.

  1. Whatever the ambiguities and ideological interpretations of the Israelites among the early Muslims, these Muslims entered into “political and military battles” with the Jewish fortresses, and decades and decades would pass before the Jews returned to the courts of the caliphs and princes, and supervised the funds and offices of dozens of them, especially during the Umayyad era and its expansion into Andalusia. . However, the “golden era” of Jewish influence began with Saladin al-Ayyubi and his heirs in Egypt and the Levant, when he appointed Moses ibn Maimon as his advisor, the greatest Jewish rabbi and the greatest Jewish figure after Moses (the first).

Saladin had allowed the Jews to settle in Jerusalem, before the Crusaders returned to occupying it in collusion with Saladin's nephew, King Al-Kamil Al-Ayyubid, so that the Crusaders exterminated all the Jews in the city.

In addition, throughout the centuries of Ottoman occupation of the Arab East, Jews flocked to the city and to Palestine, and during the time of Sultan Abdul Hamid II, they were able to build dozens of settlements in what was known as undeclared collusion, so as not to affect the reputation of the Sultan, who continued to deny this.

The Jewish “state” and Jerusalem...what does it mean?
In light of the above, in addition to the current political dimensions of the Jewishness of the “state,” and the enemy’s attempt to seize Jerusalem and Judaize it as a political center, there is a racist ideological dimension that is no less important, which is the dimension related to the idea of the “chosen people” in contrast to the goyim (the Gentiles who are equal to animals). ), who were created to serve Jehovah's people; The only people on earth who deserve this description, according to the Torah.

When Peres, and after him Netanyahu, and the owners of the “Deal of the Century” spoke of an Israeli center and a Jordanian-Palestinian and Arab periphery, they were practically expressing the aforementioned racist goyim ideology. Opposite the Israeli center (God’s chosen people), the Jordanian-Palestinian periphery, through Oslo, Wadi Araba, and the preparations for the Deal of the Century, is the periphery of Gentiles, goyim, slaves and animals devoted to the “state” of the rabbis, which does not complete the alleged sacred sign with the “Jewish Lord.” Except through another racist idea, which is the idea of the sacred beatification of the center of the earth and the alleged temple.

The occupation and Judaization of Jerusalem is not only an act of politically aggressive settlement, but rather it is the pinnacle of Jewish ideology in terms of time and space, between the alleged Jewish sanctity and the desecrations and other abominations of Gentiles, Muslims and Christians alike.

*The opinions mentioned in this article do not necessarily express the opinion of the agency, but rather express the opinion of its author exclusively*