The Israeli plan, in its strategic dimension, is based on the complete restructuring of Arab consciousness, ensuring firstly its political presence in the Middle East region, and secondly its influence as an element controlling its various sectors.

Phenomena appear in life to which we do not give sufficient reading and scrutiny. Among those phenomena that have begun to take shape and appear in our lives is what we notice of an attempt to replace the vocabulary of conflict that has prevailed for long periods with others that “fit” the general flabby Arab situation in which we live.

After the announcement of the normalization agreement, with the accompanying change in values and concepts, and major transformations in all aspects of life and its economic, political, cultural and social concepts, another phase began that was completely different from what preceded it, as the conflict became focused on forming the features of the new phase and “new tools of conflict.” . 

It is true that only a very short period of time has passed to monitor and investigate the broad and profound geopolitical transformations, but some effects may appear in a much shorter period than that, and some may even be immediate. This is what can be said, with a high degree of accuracy in diagnosis and evaluation, about the normalization agreements and the many different effects that resulted from them that appeared clearly in the first years of these agreements. 

We can say that this path has included various areas aimed at weakening the spirit of citizenship, dividing identity, confusing social awareness, and strengthening the “ego” at the expense of “the whole,” which causes psychological frustration among the majority of the people of Arab society. In addition to this, there is confusion in concept and identity, as what the Arab world is witnessing today is part of the narcissism of the “ego” and its successions, with the imbalance it has caused in the system of values, and with the climate it may create for the values of future conflicts in the homeland, God forbid.

Everyone recognizes the power of language and its importance in shaping the moral world in which we live. In the Arab world as well, some “political elites” are no longer willing to continue using the old “revolutionary political” vocabulary to express the prevailing relationship between “Israel” on the one hand, and the Arabs on the other hand. Rather, they seek to establish a political linguistic framework that is compatible with “the requirements of the stage,” through... Changing the national moral terms and concepts that were prevalent, such as “enemy,” “liberation,” “armed struggle,” “military engagement,” and “commander action”… and replacing them with terms such as “political engagement” and “embarrassing the enemy.” “Sound resistance,” “the axis of moderation,” “Israel’s right to defend itself,” “the Abrahamic religion,” and others. 

The terms “no reconciliation, no negotiation, no recognition of Israel” no longer exist in absolute terms. Rather, there is a new vision formed regarding this relationship, which is based on responding to the American position supporting and stimulating Israel’s involvement in the Middle East region, and replacing everything that could It disrupts this engagement. 

This change in moral vocabulary and concepts means that these “elites” are no longer able to present themselves as facing “issues of military conflict” resulting from a “land dispute.” The new language makes it clear that we are facing a “situation” that is aware of the “regional and global” consequences of its position and the extent of the danger of its vocabulary and language, as changing the language comes with the aim of “subduing society” and convincing it to face the truth and accept reality as it is, and to achieve the exclusive interests of these “elites,” and thus the interest of the Zionist project. Colonial expansion and control, and the legitimacy of its existence that it needs in order to expand geopolitically in the region. 

We all realize that the “Arab-Israeli conflict” falls under what might be called the “social conflict,” as it is based on the substitutionary existential concept, not just the conflict over the borders, and the ideological dimension in it plays a pivotal role reinforced by Zionist thought and the attempt to rebuild the existential narrative of the occupation. 

The Israeli plan, in its strategic dimension, is based on the complete restructuring of Arab consciousness, ensuring, firstly, its political presence in the Middle East region, and secondly, its influence as an element that controls its various sectors, by controlling the elements of power that it possesses, namely education, technology, and the economy, and enabling it to create a situation There was a long period of general calm that later reached a form of understanding at the international, regional and Arab levels.

In fact, on the psychological side, these Arab “elites” change the language used in the “Israeli-Arab conflict” and replace the revolutionary national moral rules, which is what they need to move forward with their normalization project, and most importantly, it does not come spontaneously, but rather intentional, as the essence of normalization Its goal is to make the racist Jewish presence in Palestine a natural matter that is accepted and recognized, so that it does not require resistance and existential conflict with it. 

In fact, it is an expression of the complete “helplessness” that has befallen her, while she tends to rush to justify helplessness whenever she feels it encircling her. She does so to defend the self that is accused of helplessness. According to psychologists, the feeling of impotence, failure, or negligence causes severe pain to the self, so the mind tends to search for justifications for what happened in order to relieve itself of the feeling of pain that it feels as a result of its negligence, inability, or failure. Sometimes, some justifications may seem acceptable, and may deceive the listeners, but in many cases they are not.

Sometimes, justification alone is not enough to alleviate the pain of feeling helpless on oneself, so a person tends to search for alternatives that compensate for what he was unable to achieve, such as a lover saying when he was unable to meet his beloved, so he turned to himself and consoles her by having alternatives that make what he missed out on achieving irrelevant. :

Isn't the night bringing Umm Amr and us together? This is our closeness.

Yes, and I see the crescent as you see it, and above it is the day as it appeared to me

These alternatives, even if they seem false to the point of laughing at them, nevertheless provide their owner with a feeling of comfort. Here he convinces himself that he is happy as long as one night shades him and his beloved, one day shines on them both, and a shared moon between them, their eyes embracing in contemplation of its beauty.

Justification is a kind of barter with oneself, as a person deceives, lies to, and misleads himself until he sees things and situations in the color he likes. In return, it gives him a feeling of comfort and satisfaction. May God have mercy on Al-Mutanabbi when he said: Life is only pure for those who misrepresent themselves in the facts!

In the final outcome, the normalizers aim to bring about a revolution in the nation’s consciousness by manipulating vocabulary and concepts, and mentally hijacking the nation for the benefit of the usurping enemy, when concepts change and the enemy turns into a friend, and the friend into an enemy. They also aim to reformulate our minds and thinking in order to accept the existence of the Israeli enemy so that it becomes a natural matter. Which means our Arab and Islamic nation abandoning the Palestinian issue, Jerusalem and the Holy Mosque. 

In conclusion, this “coloration” and changing concepts should not lead us to despair, but rather it is a moment of blatant, revealing “moral” clarity, and an urgent step in a long journey driven by hope.